@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.tcei7a440h{height:105px;position:relative ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.tcei7a440h{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.tcei7a440h{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.tcei7a440h{height:105px;} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.or0edeuzdv{height:100% ;margin:0 auto 0 auto ;position:relative ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.or0edeuzdv{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.or0edeuzdv{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.or0edeuzdv{} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.tn892fcf37{height:40px ;width:2px ;top:80px ;right:15px ;position:absolute ;} } @media screen and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.tn892fcf37:before {margin: 30px 0 0;}}@media screen and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.tn892fcf37:after {margin: 60px 0 0;}} @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.tn892fcf37{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.tn892fcf37{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.tn892fcf37{display:none ;} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp{height:100% ;width:100% ;padding:0 15px 0 ;top:0 ;left:0 ;position:absolute ;position: fixed; width: 100%;left: 0;right: 0;margin: 0 auto;max-width: 1170px;pointer-events: none;z-index: -3;} } @media screen and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp .themecomp_text {width: 100%;height: 100%;}}@media screen and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp table {width: 100%;height: 100%;border: 0; table-layout: fixed;}}@media screen and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp table td {border-bottom: 0;border-color:rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.03);}}@media screen and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp table {border-left: 1px solid;border-right: 1px solid;border-color:rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.06);}}@media screen and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp table td:last-child {border-right: 0;}}@media (max-width: 1200px) and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp {max-width:970px;}} @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp{} }@media (max-width: 991px) and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp {max-width:768px;}} @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.b6s711izgp{} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql{z-index:9;padding:0 0px 0 ;top:30px ;left:126px ;position:relative ;float:right ;} } @media screen and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql .current-menu-item > a {color:#efc17c !important;font-style: italic;}.themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql .current_page_item > a {color:#efc17c !important;font-style: italic;}.themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql .current-menu-ancestor > a {color:#efc17c !important;font-style: italic;}.themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql .current_page_ancestor > a {color:#efc17c !important;font-style: italic;}.themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql .current-menu-parent > a {color:#efc17c !important;font-style: italic;}.themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql .current_page_parent > a {color:#efc17c !important;font-style: italic;}} @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.yuvugcmnql{} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.ky2ofgfq18{width:150px ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.ky2ofgfq18{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.ky2ofgfq18{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.ky2ofgfq18{} }
body:not(.themecomp_mobile) .themecomp_menu.hu5q5prmup.themecomp_horis > .themecomp-menu-li.megamenu > ul > li > a {background-color:#272727;color:#cccccc !important;} .themecomp_menu.hu5q5prmup.themecomp_horis .html_area.i .themecomp_peicon {height:20px}
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.t7071d1iwy{height:100% ;margin:0 auto ;left:-40px ;position:relative ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.t7071d1iwy{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.t7071d1iwy{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.t7071d1iwy{width:100% ;max-width:320px ;} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.u8oqc8uc2c{height:100% ;width:100% ;bottom:2px ;position:absolute ;background-size:contain ;background-repeat:no-repeat ;background-position:center bottom ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.u8oqc8uc2c{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.u8oqc8uc2c{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.u8oqc8uc2c{} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.qupyr8rvpi{width:100% ;max-width:500px ;margin:0 auto ;right:0 ;bottom:40px ;left:0 ;position:absolute ;text-align:center ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.qupyr8rvpi{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.qupyr8rvpi{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.qupyr8rvpi{bottom:60px ;} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.gtas69v1y3{overflow:hidden;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.gtas69v1y3{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.gtas69v1y3{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.gtas69v1y3{} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.pzy1j8791m{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.pzy1j8791m{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.pzy1j8791m{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.pzy1j8791m{} .themecomp_megadiv.pzy1j8791m *,.themecomp_megadiv.pzy1j8791m {font-size:50px !important;} }

TAHANINA

@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.pln2tn7iyq{bottom:20px ;left:15px ;position:absolute ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.pln2tn7iyq{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.pln2tn7iyq{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.pln2tn7iyq{display:none ;} }


@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.aaphzvarj9{padding:3px ;top:80px ;right:15px ;position:absolute ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.aaphzvarj9{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.aaphzvarj9{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.aaphzvarj9{} }
.themecomp_toggle-wrapper-wrap.lc0jkv2sfl #themecomp_menu-toggle, .themecomp_toggle-wrapper-wrap.lc0jkv2sfl #themecomp_menu-toggle:before, .themecomp_toggle-wrapper-wrap.lc0jkv2sfl #themecomp_menu-toggle:after {background:#ffffff;} @media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_toggle-wrapper-wrap.lc0jkv2sfl {padding:;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_toggle-wrapper-wrap.lc0jkv2sfl {padding:;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_toggle-wrapper-wrap.lc0jkv2sfl {padding:;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_toggle-wrapper-wrap.lc0jkv2sfl {padding:;} }
.themecomp_mobile_menu.lc0jkv2sfl .themecomp_menu > .themecomp-menu-li > a {font-size:16px;} .themecomp_mobile_menu.lc0jkv2sfl .themecomp-menu-li a {color:#fff !important;background:transparent !important;} .themecomp_mobile_menu.lc0jkv2sfl .themecomp_menu:before {background:#111;}
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.dg4wzaxqtw{right:15px ;bottom:6px ;position:absolute ;} } @media screen and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.dg4wzaxqtw a:hover i {color:#efc17c !important;}} @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.dg4wzaxqtw{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.dg4wzaxqtw{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.dg4wzaxqtw{width:100% ;right:0 ;text-align:center ;} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_soc_holder.lv2aexxjkq a {color:#ffffff;font-size:12px;width:25px;} .themecomp_soc_holder.lv2aexxjkq a svg * {fill:#ffffff;} .themecomp_soc_holder.lv2aexxjkq a svg {width:12px; display: block;margin: 0 auto;} .themecomp_soc_holder.lv2aexxjkq a:hover {color: !important;} .themecomp_soc_holder.lv2aexxjkq a:hover svg * {fill: !important;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_soc_holder.lv2aexxjkq a {width:;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_soc_holder.lv2aexxjkq a{width:;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_soc_holder.lv2aexxjkq a {width:;} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.wck2mr0j4t{z-index:-9;height:100% ;width:100% ;padding:80px 60px 0 ;top:0 ;left:0 ;position:absolute ;pointer-events: none;} } @media (max-width: 1400px) and (min-width: 0px) {.themecomp_megadiv.wck2mr0j4t {padding:80px 12px 0;}} @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.wck2mr0j4t{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.wck2mr0j4t{padding:80px 7px 0 ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.wck2mr0j4t{padding:80px 15px 0 ;} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.fhaqjs66aq{height:100% ;width:100% ;top:0 ;left:0 ;position:relative ;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.fhaqjs66aq{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.fhaqjs66aq{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.fhaqjs66aq{} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.knrbzu4wl0{height:2px ;width:0 ;position:absolute ;background-color:#efc17c;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.knrbzu4wl0{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.knrbzu4wl0{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.knrbzu4wl0{} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.wn5537yf33{height:2px ;width:0 ;right:0 ;bottom:0 ;position:absolute ;background-color:#efc17c;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.wn5537yf33{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.wn5537yf33{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.wn5537yf33{} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.nxedh01xwf{height:0 ;width:2px ;top:0 ;left:0 ;position:absolute ;background-color:#efc17c;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.nxedh01xwf{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.nxedh01xwf{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.nxedh01xwf{} }
@media screen and (min-width: 0px) { .themecomp_megadiv.rxiddzl0gy{height:0 ;width:2px ;right:0 ;bottom:0 ;position:absolute ;background-color:#efc17c;} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 1199px) { .themecomp_megadiv.rxiddzl0gy{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 991px) { .themecomp_megadiv.rxiddzl0gy{} } @media (min-width: 0px) and (max-width: 767px) { .themecomp_megadiv.rxiddzl0gy{} }

Aphrodite Secrets That No One Else Knows About

[aphrodite_text basenum=”tu5n8tbcyu”]

What is good typography?

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”r7uxxplm61″ lg=”20px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”ae47upajvb”]

Good ty­pog­ra­phy re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text. Al­most all texts com­mu­ni­cate a set of points (The pe­ti­tion should be de­nied for three rea­sons). Some­times a text also needs to in­struct the reader (Add lines 7 through 21 and en­ter the to­tal here). Other texts of­fer warn­ings or ad­mo­ni­tions (You must be 48 inches tall to ride; Speed limit 75). In every case, good ty­pog­ra­phy sup­ports and re­in­forces the mes­sage. Good ty­pog­ra­phy makes the text more effective.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”gc3yfl4te9″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”luoqvzb8po”]

Three sub­sidiary propo­si­tions flow from this:

  1. Good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured by how well it re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, not by some ab­stract scale of merit. Ty­po­graphic choices that work for one text won’t nec­es­sar­ily work for an­other. (Corol­lary: good ty­pog­ra­phers don’t rely on rote so­lu­tions. One size never fits all.)
  2. For a given text, there are many ty­po­graphic so­lu­tions that would be equally good. Ty­pog­ra­phy is not a math prob­lem with one cor­rect answer.
  3. Your abil­ity to pro­duce good ty­pog­ra­phy de­pends on how well you un­der­stand the goals of your text, not on taste or vi­sual train­ing. (Corol­lary: if you mis­un­der­stand the mean­ing of your text, good ty­pog­ra­phy be­comes purely a mat­ter of luck.)

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”ixx5rpe7s6″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”z610y4k4f6″]

Pause to ab­sorb the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of propo­si­tion #3. Ty­pog­ra­phy is vi­sual, so it’s easy to con­clude that it’s pri­mar­ily an artis­tic or aes­thetic pur­suit. Not so. Ty­pog­ra­phy is pri­mar­ily utilitarian.

There­fore, good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured on a util­i­tar­ian yard­stick. Ty­pog­ra­phy that is aes­thet­i­cally pleas­ant, but that doesn’t re­in­force the mean­ing of the text, is a fail­ure. Ty­pog­ra­phy that re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, even if aes­thet­i­cally un­pleas­ant, is a success.

Does that mean that ef­fec­tive ty­pog­ra­phy can be ugly? Sure. Some­times ugly is bet­ter than pretty.

Look at the high­way signs again.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”htvan20bvu” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7 e_class=”row”][aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”giz6exopzx”]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7][aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”uz9nubw6i4″]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5][/aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7][aphrodite_empty basenum=”lgab9f2636″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”pg47q2bz74″]

The script font used on the sec­ond sign could be called “pret­tier” than the stan­dard high­way-sig­nage font. But a high­way sign has a spe­cial pur­pose: it’s meant to be read quickly, from long dis­tances, at odd an­gles, and un­der vari­able light­ing and weather con­di­tions. The high­way-sig­nage font stays leg­i­ble un­der all these con­di­tions. It con­sti­tutes good ty­pog­ra­phy be­cause it sup­ports the sign’s message.

The script font may be pret­tier, but in this con­text, it’s bad ty­pog­ra­phy, be­cause it’s not suited to the task. Con­versely, the high­way-sig­nage font would look ter­ri­ble on a wed­ding in­vi­ta­tion, where the script font would be appropriate.

A re­lated example:

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”sv8uj4fk8y” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”bm9oa58d0r”]

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”otekhw2vga” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”wkd5e5hbg7″]

Here, the same font is used in all three ver­sions of this sign. But the first two signs fail to de­liver the mes­sage—the speed limit is 75—be­cause the ty­pog­ra­phy un­der­mines the text. The most im­por­tant el­e­ment is the num­ber 75. Also im­por­tant is the cap­tion speed limit. Only the third ver­sion gets the bal­ance right. It’s the only ex­am­ple of good ty­pog­ra­phy among the three.

Use this prin­ci­ple to test the qual­ity of your own ty­po­graphic work. The ad­van­tage of ap­ply­ing a util­i­tar­ian bench­mark in­stead of an aes­thetic one is that it doesn’t re­quire aes­thetic judg­ment. Be­lieve me, if you’re just start­ing out in ty­pog­ra­phy, you will pro­duce some ugly work. Don’t worry. If it’s ugly and ef­fec­tive, you’re mak­ing progress.

[/aphrodite_text]

Things You Should Know About Aphrodite

[aphrodite_text basenum=”tu5n8tbcyu”]

What is good typography?

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”r7uxxplm61″ lg=”20px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”ae47upajvb”]

Good ty­pog­ra­phy re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text. Al­most all texts com­mu­ni­cate a set of points (The pe­ti­tion should be de­nied for three rea­sons). Some­times a text also needs to in­struct the reader (Add lines 7 through 21 and en­ter the to­tal here). Other texts of­fer warn­ings or ad­mo­ni­tions (You must be 48 inches tall to ride; Speed limit 75). In every case, good ty­pog­ra­phy sup­ports and re­in­forces the mes­sage. Good ty­pog­ra­phy makes the text more effective.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”gc3yfl4te9″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”luoqvzb8po”]

Three sub­sidiary propo­si­tions flow from this:

  1. Good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured by how well it re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, not by some ab­stract scale of merit. Ty­po­graphic choices that work for one text won’t nec­es­sar­ily work for an­other. (Corol­lary: good ty­pog­ra­phers don’t rely on rote so­lu­tions. One size never fits all.)
  2. For a given text, there are many ty­po­graphic so­lu­tions that would be equally good. Ty­pog­ra­phy is not a math prob­lem with one cor­rect answer.
  3. Your abil­ity to pro­duce good ty­pog­ra­phy de­pends on how well you un­der­stand the goals of your text, not on taste or vi­sual train­ing. (Corol­lary: if you mis­un­der­stand the mean­ing of your text, good ty­pog­ra­phy be­comes purely a mat­ter of luck.)

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”ixx5rpe7s6″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”z610y4k4f6″]

Pause to ab­sorb the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of propo­si­tion #3. Ty­pog­ra­phy is vi­sual, so it’s easy to con­clude that it’s pri­mar­ily an artis­tic or aes­thetic pur­suit. Not so. Ty­pog­ra­phy is pri­mar­ily utilitarian.

There­fore, good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured on a util­i­tar­ian yard­stick. Ty­pog­ra­phy that is aes­thet­i­cally pleas­ant, but that doesn’t re­in­force the mean­ing of the text, is a fail­ure. Ty­pog­ra­phy that re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, even if aes­thet­i­cally un­pleas­ant, is a success.

Does that mean that ef­fec­tive ty­pog­ra­phy can be ugly? Sure. Some­times ugly is bet­ter than pretty.

Look at the high­way signs again.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”htvan20bvu” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7 e_class=”row”][aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”giz6exopzx”]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7][aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”uz9nubw6i4″]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5][/aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7][aphrodite_empty basenum=”lgab9f2636″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”pg47q2bz74″]

The script font used on the sec­ond sign could be called “pret­tier” than the stan­dard high­way-sig­nage font. But a high­way sign has a spe­cial pur­pose: it’s meant to be read quickly, from long dis­tances, at odd an­gles, and un­der vari­able light­ing and weather con­di­tions. The high­way-sig­nage font stays leg­i­ble un­der all these con­di­tions. It con­sti­tutes good ty­pog­ra­phy be­cause it sup­ports the sign’s message.

The script font may be pret­tier, but in this con­text, it’s bad ty­pog­ra­phy, be­cause it’s not suited to the task. Con­versely, the high­way-sig­nage font would look ter­ri­ble on a wed­ding in­vi­ta­tion, where the script font would be appropriate.

A re­lated example:

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”sv8uj4fk8y” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”bm9oa58d0r”]

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”otekhw2vga” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”wkd5e5hbg7″]

Here, the same font is used in all three ver­sions of this sign. But the first two signs fail to de­liver the mes­sage—the speed limit is 75—be­cause the ty­pog­ra­phy un­der­mines the text. The most im­por­tant el­e­ment is the num­ber 75. Also im­por­tant is the cap­tion speed limit. Only the third ver­sion gets the bal­ance right. It’s the only ex­am­ple of good ty­pog­ra­phy among the three.

Use this prin­ci­ple to test the qual­ity of your own ty­po­graphic work. The ad­van­tage of ap­ply­ing a util­i­tar­ian bench­mark in­stead of an aes­thetic one is that it doesn’t re­quire aes­thetic judg­ment. Be­lieve me, if you’re just start­ing out in ty­pog­ra­phy, you will pro­duce some ugly work. Don’t worry. If it’s ugly and ef­fec­tive, you’re mak­ing progress.

[/aphrodite_text]

Who Else Wants To Learn About Aphrodite?

[aphrodite_text basenum=”tu5n8tbcyu”]

What is good typography?

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”r7uxxplm61″ lg=”20px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”ae47upajvb”]

Good ty­pog­ra­phy re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text. Al­most all texts com­mu­ni­cate a set of points (The pe­ti­tion should be de­nied for three rea­sons). Some­times a text also needs to in­struct the reader (Add lines 7 through 21 and en­ter the to­tal here). Other texts of­fer warn­ings or ad­mo­ni­tions (You must be 48 inches tall to ride; Speed limit 75). In every case, good ty­pog­ra­phy sup­ports and re­in­forces the mes­sage. Good ty­pog­ra­phy makes the text more effective.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”gc3yfl4te9″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”luoqvzb8po”]

Three sub­sidiary propo­si­tions flow from this:

  1. Good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured by how well it re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, not by some ab­stract scale of merit. Ty­po­graphic choices that work for one text won’t nec­es­sar­ily work for an­other. (Corol­lary: good ty­pog­ra­phers don’t rely on rote so­lu­tions. One size never fits all.)
  2. For a given text, there are many ty­po­graphic so­lu­tions that would be equally good. Ty­pog­ra­phy is not a math prob­lem with one cor­rect answer.
  3. Your abil­ity to pro­duce good ty­pog­ra­phy de­pends on how well you un­der­stand the goals of your text, not on taste or vi­sual train­ing. (Corol­lary: if you mis­un­der­stand the mean­ing of your text, good ty­pog­ra­phy be­comes purely a mat­ter of luck.)

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”ixx5rpe7s6″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”z610y4k4f6″]

Pause to ab­sorb the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of propo­si­tion #3. Ty­pog­ra­phy is vi­sual, so it’s easy to con­clude that it’s pri­mar­ily an artis­tic or aes­thetic pur­suit. Not so. Ty­pog­ra­phy is pri­mar­ily utilitarian.

There­fore, good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured on a util­i­tar­ian yard­stick. Ty­pog­ra­phy that is aes­thet­i­cally pleas­ant, but that doesn’t re­in­force the mean­ing of the text, is a fail­ure. Ty­pog­ra­phy that re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, even if aes­thet­i­cally un­pleas­ant, is a success.

Does that mean that ef­fec­tive ty­pog­ra­phy can be ugly? Sure. Some­times ugly is bet­ter than pretty.

Look at the high­way signs again.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”htvan20bvu” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7 e_class=”row”][aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”giz6exopzx”]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7][aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”uz9nubw6i4″]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5][/aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7][aphrodite_empty basenum=”lgab9f2636″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”pg47q2bz74″]

The script font used on the sec­ond sign could be called “pret­tier” than the stan­dard high­way-sig­nage font. But a high­way sign has a spe­cial pur­pose: it’s meant to be read quickly, from long dis­tances, at odd an­gles, and un­der vari­able light­ing and weather con­di­tions. The high­way-sig­nage font stays leg­i­ble un­der all these con­di­tions. It con­sti­tutes good ty­pog­ra­phy be­cause it sup­ports the sign’s message.

The script font may be pret­tier, but in this con­text, it’s bad ty­pog­ra­phy, be­cause it’s not suited to the task. Con­versely, the high­way-sig­nage font would look ter­ri­ble on a wed­ding in­vi­ta­tion, where the script font would be appropriate.

A re­lated example:

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”sv8uj4fk8y” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”bm9oa58d0r”]

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”otekhw2vga” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”wkd5e5hbg7″]

Here, the same font is used in all three ver­sions of this sign. But the first two signs fail to de­liver the mes­sage—the speed limit is 75—be­cause the ty­pog­ra­phy un­der­mines the text. The most im­por­tant el­e­ment is the num­ber 75. Also im­por­tant is the cap­tion speed limit. Only the third ver­sion gets the bal­ance right. It’s the only ex­am­ple of good ty­pog­ra­phy among the three.

Use this prin­ci­ple to test the qual­ity of your own ty­po­graphic work. The ad­van­tage of ap­ply­ing a util­i­tar­ian bench­mark in­stead of an aes­thetic one is that it doesn’t re­quire aes­thetic judg­ment. Be­lieve me, if you’re just start­ing out in ty­pog­ra­phy, you will pro­duce some ugly work. Don’t worry. If it’s ugly and ef­fec­tive, you’re mak­ing progress.

[/aphrodite_text]

The Do This, Get That Guide On Aphrodite

[aphrodite_text basenum=”tu5n8tbcyu”]

What is good typography?

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”r7uxxplm61″ lg=”20px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”ae47upajvb”]

Good ty­pog­ra­phy re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text. Al­most all texts com­mu­ni­cate a set of points (The pe­ti­tion should be de­nied for three rea­sons). Some­times a text also needs to in­struct the reader (Add lines 7 through 21 and en­ter the to­tal here). Other texts of­fer warn­ings or ad­mo­ni­tions (You must be 48 inches tall to ride; Speed limit 75). In every case, good ty­pog­ra­phy sup­ports and re­in­forces the mes­sage. Good ty­pog­ra­phy makes the text more effective.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”gc3yfl4te9″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”luoqvzb8po”]

Three sub­sidiary propo­si­tions flow from this:

  1. Good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured by how well it re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, not by some ab­stract scale of merit. Ty­po­graphic choices that work for one text won’t nec­es­sar­ily work for an­other. (Corol­lary: good ty­pog­ra­phers don’t rely on rote so­lu­tions. One size never fits all.)
  2. For a given text, there are many ty­po­graphic so­lu­tions that would be equally good. Ty­pog­ra­phy is not a math prob­lem with one cor­rect answer.
  3. Your abil­ity to pro­duce good ty­pog­ra­phy de­pends on how well you un­der­stand the goals of your text, not on taste or vi­sual train­ing. (Corol­lary: if you mis­un­der­stand the mean­ing of your text, good ty­pog­ra­phy be­comes purely a mat­ter of luck.)

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”ixx5rpe7s6″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”z610y4k4f6″]

Pause to ab­sorb the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of propo­si­tion #3. Ty­pog­ra­phy is vi­sual, so it’s easy to con­clude that it’s pri­mar­ily an artis­tic or aes­thetic pur­suit. Not so. Ty­pog­ra­phy is pri­mar­ily utilitarian.

There­fore, good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured on a util­i­tar­ian yard­stick. Ty­pog­ra­phy that is aes­thet­i­cally pleas­ant, but that doesn’t re­in­force the mean­ing of the text, is a fail­ure. Ty­pog­ra­phy that re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, even if aes­thet­i­cally un­pleas­ant, is a success.

Does that mean that ef­fec­tive ty­pog­ra­phy can be ugly? Sure. Some­times ugly is bet­ter than pretty.

Look at the high­way signs again.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”htvan20bvu” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7 e_class=”row”][aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”giz6exopzx”]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7][aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”uz9nubw6i4″]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5][/aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7][aphrodite_empty basenum=”lgab9f2636″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”pg47q2bz74″]

The script font used on the sec­ond sign could be called “pret­tier” than the stan­dard high­way-sig­nage font. But a high­way sign has a spe­cial pur­pose: it’s meant to be read quickly, from long dis­tances, at odd an­gles, and un­der vari­able light­ing and weather con­di­tions. The high­way-sig­nage font stays leg­i­ble un­der all these con­di­tions. It con­sti­tutes good ty­pog­ra­phy be­cause it sup­ports the sign’s message.

The script font may be pret­tier, but in this con­text, it’s bad ty­pog­ra­phy, be­cause it’s not suited to the task. Con­versely, the high­way-sig­nage font would look ter­ri­ble on a wed­ding in­vi­ta­tion, where the script font would be appropriate.

A re­lated example:

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”sv8uj4fk8y” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”bm9oa58d0r”]

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”otekhw2vga” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”wkd5e5hbg7″]

Here, the same font is used in all three ver­sions of this sign. But the first two signs fail to de­liver the mes­sage—the speed limit is 75—be­cause the ty­pog­ra­phy un­der­mines the text. The most im­por­tant el­e­ment is the num­ber 75. Also im­por­tant is the cap­tion speed limit. Only the third ver­sion gets the bal­ance right. It’s the only ex­am­ple of good ty­pog­ra­phy among the three.

Use this prin­ci­ple to test the qual­ity of your own ty­po­graphic work. The ad­van­tage of ap­ply­ing a util­i­tar­ian bench­mark in­stead of an aes­thetic one is that it doesn’t re­quire aes­thetic judg­ment. Be­lieve me, if you’re just start­ing out in ty­pog­ra­phy, you will pro­duce some ugly work. Don’t worry. If it’s ugly and ef­fec­tive, you’re mak­ing progress.

[/aphrodite_text]

Aphrodite No Longer a Mystery

[aphrodite_text basenum=”tu5n8tbcyu”]

What is good typography?

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”r7uxxplm61″ lg=”20px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”ae47upajvb”]

Good ty­pog­ra­phy re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text. Al­most all texts com­mu­ni­cate a set of points (The pe­ti­tion should be de­nied for three rea­sons). Some­times a text also needs to in­struct the reader (Add lines 7 through 21 and en­ter the to­tal here). Other texts of­fer warn­ings or ad­mo­ni­tions (You must be 48 inches tall to ride; Speed limit 75). In every case, good ty­pog­ra­phy sup­ports and re­in­forces the mes­sage. Good ty­pog­ra­phy makes the text more effective.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”gc3yfl4te9″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”luoqvzb8po”]

Three sub­sidiary propo­si­tions flow from this:

  1. Good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured by how well it re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, not by some ab­stract scale of merit. Ty­po­graphic choices that work for one text won’t nec­es­sar­ily work for an­other. (Corol­lary: good ty­pog­ra­phers don’t rely on rote so­lu­tions. One size never fits all.)
  2. For a given text, there are many ty­po­graphic so­lu­tions that would be equally good. Ty­pog­ra­phy is not a math prob­lem with one cor­rect answer.
  3. Your abil­ity to pro­duce good ty­pog­ra­phy de­pends on how well you un­der­stand the goals of your text, not on taste or vi­sual train­ing. (Corol­lary: if you mis­un­der­stand the mean­ing of your text, good ty­pog­ra­phy be­comes purely a mat­ter of luck.)

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”ixx5rpe7s6″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”z610y4k4f6″]

Pause to ab­sorb the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of propo­si­tion #3. Ty­pog­ra­phy is vi­sual, so it’s easy to con­clude that it’s pri­mar­ily an artis­tic or aes­thetic pur­suit. Not so. Ty­pog­ra­phy is pri­mar­ily utilitarian.

There­fore, good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured on a util­i­tar­ian yard­stick. Ty­pog­ra­phy that is aes­thet­i­cally pleas­ant, but that doesn’t re­in­force the mean­ing of the text, is a fail­ure. Ty­pog­ra­phy that re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, even if aes­thet­i­cally un­pleas­ant, is a success.

Does that mean that ef­fec­tive ty­pog­ra­phy can be ugly? Sure. Some­times ugly is bet­ter than pretty.

Look at the high­way signs again.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”htvan20bvu” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7 e_class=”row”][aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”giz6exopzx”]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7][aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”uz9nubw6i4″]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5][/aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7][aphrodite_empty basenum=”lgab9f2636″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”pg47q2bz74″]

The script font used on the sec­ond sign could be called “pret­tier” than the stan­dard high­way-sig­nage font. But a high­way sign has a spe­cial pur­pose: it’s meant to be read quickly, from long dis­tances, at odd an­gles, and un­der vari­able light­ing and weather con­di­tions. The high­way-sig­nage font stays leg­i­ble un­der all these con­di­tions. It con­sti­tutes good ty­pog­ra­phy be­cause it sup­ports the sign’s message.

The script font may be pret­tier, but in this con­text, it’s bad ty­pog­ra­phy, be­cause it’s not suited to the task. Con­versely, the high­way-sig­nage font would look ter­ri­ble on a wed­ding in­vi­ta­tion, where the script font would be appropriate.

A re­lated example:

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”sv8uj4fk8y” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”bm9oa58d0r”]

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”otekhw2vga” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”wkd5e5hbg7″]

Here, the same font is used in all three ver­sions of this sign. But the first two signs fail to de­liver the mes­sage—the speed limit is 75—be­cause the ty­pog­ra­phy un­der­mines the text. The most im­por­tant el­e­ment is the num­ber 75. Also im­por­tant is the cap­tion speed limit. Only the third ver­sion gets the bal­ance right. It’s the only ex­am­ple of good ty­pog­ra­phy among the three.

Use this prin­ci­ple to test the qual­ity of your own ty­po­graphic work. The ad­van­tage of ap­ply­ing a util­i­tar­ian bench­mark in­stead of an aes­thetic one is that it doesn’t re­quire aes­thetic judg­ment. Be­lieve me, if you’re just start­ing out in ty­pog­ra­phy, you will pro­duce some ugly work. Don’t worry. If it’s ugly and ef­fec­tive, you’re mak­ing progress.

[/aphrodite_text]

Aphrodite : The Ultimate Convenience!

[aphrodite_text basenum=”tu5n8tbcyu”]

What is good typography?

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”r7uxxplm61″ lg=”20px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”ae47upajvb”]

Good ty­pog­ra­phy re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text. Al­most all texts com­mu­ni­cate a set of points (The pe­ti­tion should be de­nied for three rea­sons). Some­times a text also needs to in­struct the reader (Add lines 7 through 21 and en­ter the to­tal here). Other texts of­fer warn­ings or ad­mo­ni­tions (You must be 48 inches tall to ride; Speed limit 75). In every case, good ty­pog­ra­phy sup­ports and re­in­forces the mes­sage. Good ty­pog­ra­phy makes the text more effective.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”gc3yfl4te9″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”luoqvzb8po”]

Three sub­sidiary propo­si­tions flow from this:

  1. Good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured by how well it re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, not by some ab­stract scale of merit. Ty­po­graphic choices that work for one text won’t nec­es­sar­ily work for an­other. (Corol­lary: good ty­pog­ra­phers don’t rely on rote so­lu­tions. One size never fits all.)
  2. For a given text, there are many ty­po­graphic so­lu­tions that would be equally good. Ty­pog­ra­phy is not a math prob­lem with one cor­rect answer.
  3. Your abil­ity to pro­duce good ty­pog­ra­phy de­pends on how well you un­der­stand the goals of your text, not on taste or vi­sual train­ing. (Corol­lary: if you mis­un­der­stand the mean­ing of your text, good ty­pog­ra­phy be­comes purely a mat­ter of luck.)

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”ixx5rpe7s6″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”z610y4k4f6″]

Pause to ab­sorb the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of propo­si­tion #3. Ty­pog­ra­phy is vi­sual, so it’s easy to con­clude that it’s pri­mar­ily an artis­tic or aes­thetic pur­suit. Not so. Ty­pog­ra­phy is pri­mar­ily utilitarian.

There­fore, good ty­pog­ra­phy is mea­sured on a util­i­tar­ian yard­stick. Ty­pog­ra­phy that is aes­thet­i­cally pleas­ant, but that doesn’t re­in­force the mean­ing of the text, is a fail­ure. Ty­pog­ra­phy that re­in­forces the mean­ing of the text, even if aes­thet­i­cally un­pleas­ant, is a success.

Does that mean that ef­fec­tive ty­pog­ra­phy can be ugly? Sure. Some­times ugly is bet­ter than pretty.

Look at the high­way signs again.

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”htvan20bvu” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7 e_class=”row”][aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”giz6exopzx”]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_md6umqyxa7][aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5 width_lg=”1/2″][aphrodite_text basenum=”uz9nubw6i4″]

[/aphrodite_text][/aphrodite_col_du5jbetih5][/aphrodite_block_wu2fwahkc7][aphrodite_empty basenum=”lgab9f2636″ lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”pg47q2bz74″]

The script font used on the sec­ond sign could be called “pret­tier” than the stan­dard high­way-sig­nage font. But a high­way sign has a spe­cial pur­pose: it’s meant to be read quickly, from long dis­tances, at odd an­gles, and un­der vari­able light­ing and weather con­di­tions. The high­way-sig­nage font stays leg­i­ble un­der all these con­di­tions. It con­sti­tutes good ty­pog­ra­phy be­cause it sup­ports the sign’s message.

The script font may be pret­tier, but in this con­text, it’s bad ty­pog­ra­phy, be­cause it’s not suited to the task. Con­versely, the high­way-sig­nage font would look ter­ri­ble on a wed­ding in­vi­ta­tion, where the script font would be appropriate.

A re­lated example:

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”sv8uj4fk8y” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”bm9oa58d0r”]

[/aphrodite_text][aphrodite_empty basenum=”otekhw2vga” lg=”40px”][aphrodite_text basenum=”wkd5e5hbg7″]

Here, the same font is used in all three ver­sions of this sign. But the first two signs fail to de­liver the mes­sage—the speed limit is 75—be­cause the ty­pog­ra­phy un­der­mines the text. The most im­por­tant el­e­ment is the num­ber 75. Also im­por­tant is the cap­tion speed limit. Only the third ver­sion gets the bal­ance right. It’s the only ex­am­ple of good ty­pog­ra­phy among the three.

Use this prin­ci­ple to test the qual­ity of your own ty­po­graphic work. The ad­van­tage of ap­ply­ing a util­i­tar­ian bench­mark in­stead of an aes­thetic one is that it doesn’t re­quire aes­thetic judg­ment. Be­lieve me, if you’re just start­ing out in ty­pog­ra­phy, you will pro­duce some ugly work. Don’t worry. If it’s ugly and ef­fec­tive, you’re mak­ing progress.

[/aphrodite_text]